In June, I had the pleasure of giving a keynote presentation to about 200 members of HRACO (Human Resources of Central Ohio). It went really well and the best thing I can say is I persuaded many people to try some of the influence tips I shared.
Often people ask me what I do to prepare for a presentation. I’ll start by telling you what I don’t do – wing it. I always put in lot of time, effort and practice. Here are five tips you might find helpful next time you want to give a persuasive presentation.
1. Preparation – Vince Lombardi, Hall of Fame coach of the Green Bay Packers, said, “Most people have the will to win but few have the will to prepare to win.” This can’t be overstated enough. Nobody would expect an athlete to perform with excellence without countless hours of practice so why should you expect to give a great presentation without plenty of practice?
When I do the Principles of Persuasion workshop I stress this point – what you do beforethe thing you do quite often makes your attempt at influence much easier. I’ll spend at least an hour a day for weeks on end practicing my presentations. As I do so I’m timing myself to make sure I stay within the allotted time. I work on hand gestures, head movements at key times and voice inflection.
When I’m alone in the car I turn the radio off and use the down time to practice. When I’m working out alone, between exercises I practice parts of the talk. I’ll even record myself so I can hear how it sounds.
2. Visual Aids– I use Power Point as a visual aid to almost all of my presentations and I’ll have a handout for those who like to take notes. I highly recommend two books that really influenced how I use this tool – Presentation Zen and The Presentation Secrets ofSteve Jobs.
I’ve moved away from traditional text-filled slides, bullet points and lists. If I use words it’s usually one or two in very large font to drive home a key point. Other that that I go almost entirely with pictures because that’s how people think and best remember things.
I must tell you this; the first time you present without the text and bullet points it’s a little scary because you can’t glance at the screen for a reminder of what to say next. However, there are several great reasons to go this route:It forces you to know your material inside and out which makes you look more like a professional.If you do miss something no one is any wiser because they’re not thinking, “He didn’t cover that last bullet point.”It keeps the audience focused on you rather than the screen.3. Questions – I ask lots of questions. There are two reasons you want to do this. First, you can physically engage the audience by asking for a show of hands if they agree or disagree. The more you can physically involve people the more attention they’ll pay.
The second reason is people feel compelled to answer questions. When you ask questions, even without asking people to do something like raise their hands, they’ll get involved. You’ll see it with the head nodding. Even those who don’t nod, I’ll bet they’re answering the question in their heads so they’ve moved from passive listeners to active.
4. Introduction – A strong introduction is key because it sets the tone for why people should listen to you. This means you need a bio of less than 200 words so the event host can introduce you. This leverages the principle of authority because people pay attention to those they view as having superior knowledge or wisdom.
When I speak there are two critical differentiators I want people to know. First, I make sure people know I’m one of just 27 people in the world certified to train on behalf of Robert Cialdini, the world’s most cited living social psychologist. In addition to authority this also leverages the principle of scarcity which says people value things more when they think they’re rare.
I also want audience members to know people in 185 countries have taken time to read my blog. That’s a great “Wow!” factor that incorporates the principle of consensus. I want those in attendance to think, “If so many people around the world are reading his stuff he must be pretty good.”
5. Take Away Ideas– I want to make sure my audience has tangible ideas for each of the principles I talk about. It’s nice if they find the material interesting but the bottom line is showing them how it can help them enjoy more professional success and personal happiness. To do this I clearly state, “And here’s the application for you,” then I share with few ways they can use the principle I just discussed in every day situations.
Whole books are written on the subject of presentation excellence so there’s no way to do it justice in a short blog post. However, I hope you find these tips helpful. I know focusing on them has helped me make great strides in giving more persuasive presentations and I’m confident they can help you do the same.
Brian Ahearn,
Emotional Robots
David Hanson of Hanson Robotics shows off his robotic research at his TED Talk Conference with a demo of his “Einstein” creation whose facial features mimic human expressions.
Hanson and his team’s goal is to eventually design a robot that not only realistically mimics human characteristics but that can empathize with us as well. They are doing so with the help of a variety of technologies that converge into the robotics that can be seen in his design featured in the video below. This includes very advanced expression recognition software that allows Hanson’s robots to recognize and emulate human facial expressions.
One field of robotics that has grown exponentially since the inception of robotic expression recognition software is companion robotics. Teams all over the world are working on developing artificial intelligence that can learn and grow as time progresses so that they can interact and aid the human population.
To see how emotion recognition robots are advancing check out some newer projects presented in Robots Read Facial Expressions? and Italian Technology: Emotional Androids?
Mapping Emotions
Courtesy of StockVault
Emotions seem to play a role in most aspects of human interaction and life, yet scientists and philosophers still know relatively little about them. New information on emotions is continuously evolving and Science Codex has reported on one of the newest theories on the science of Emotions.
This new theory, “the integrated embodiment theory of emotions”, is outlined in the journal of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. It posits that emotions are formulated by the integration of different bodily perceptions that have representations of external objects, events, or states of affairs. That is, emotions are not just representations of perception or thought but are separate mental states, which are a reflection of the integration of feelings of bodily processes and cognitive events.
Prof. Dr. Albert Newen and Dr. Luca Barlassina of the Institute of Philosophy II at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, are the creators of this new emotion theory and purport that their theory gives a unified and principled account of the relation between emotions and bodily perceptions, the intentionality of emotions, and emotion phenomenology.
This theory labeled an impure somatic theory of emotions and is contrasted with current pure somatic theories that posit emotions are entirely constituted by bodily perceptions. Emotions are nothing but the perception of a bodily state. That is we do not tremble because we are scared, but rather we are scared because we tremble. “This theory does not, however, consider the cognitive content of many emotions“, says Newen.
The “cognitive theory of emotions” says that emotions are essentially an assessment of the situation based on reason: this dog is dangerous because he is baring his teeth. “This theory is also unsatisfactory,” says Newen, “because it forgets the feelings as a central component of the emotion.“ For example, a person can judge that a dog is dangerous and at the same time have no fear because he is an expert in handling dangerous dogs. So the cognitive assessment does not necessarily determine the emotion.
According to Newen and Barlassina, the new theory is superior to Jesse Prinz’s most sophisticated theory of emotions so far, because this does not take into account that an emotion can also be directed at an object that is not present or does not even exist.
A related article from Science World Report purports that scientists may be able to tell exactly how a person feels by mapping their brain. For the first time, researchers have identified exactly which emotion a person is experiencing based solely on brain activity.
This study, published in PLOS One journal, claims to be different from others in that it does not rely on people to delineate their emotional state(s) (i.e. self-report). It uses a computational model that identifies individuals’ thoughts of concrete objects.
Amanda Markey , one of the researchers, points out, “Despite manifest differences between people’s psychology, different people tend to neutrally encode emotions in remarkably similar ways.“
The researchers also found that emotion signatures aren’t necessarily limited to specific brain regions. Instead, they produce characteristics patterns throughout a number of brain regions. In the future, the researchers plan to use this new identification method in order to overcome a number of challenging problems in emotion research, including identifying emotions that individuals are actively trying to suppress.
Is this new theory of emotions being separate mental states superior to the old?
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- …
- 128
- Next Page »