Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog June 18, 2026

How the Infant Brain Tracks Their Mother’s Voice

A recent study published in the Journal of Neuroscience caught my attention because it touches on a question that has fascinated me for more than four decades:

How can infants understand their mothers and caregivers long before they understand language?

This question has been with me since my undergraduate days at the University of Michigan. Like many important moments in life, my interest in this area emerged largely through circumstance and opportunity.

As a psychology student, I was invited to participate in the department’s honors program and challenged to design and conduct an original research study. When asked what interested me, I found myself returning to a simple observation: infants seem remarkably capable of understanding their mothers and caregivers despite not yet understanding words.

That question ultimately led me to conduct my first cross-cultural research project, examining preschoolers’ ability to recognize emotions from nonverbal vocal cues in the United States and Japan. It also led me to work with renowned psychologist Robert Zajonc at Michigan and, later, Paul Ekman in California. Looking back, that single question helped shape much of my career in the study of emotion and nonverbal communication.

Over the years, I have continued to follow research that sheds light on how emotional communication develops before language.

What We Know About Emotional Development Before Birth

prenatal-pregnant-baby-facial-recognitionToday, researchers have accumulated a substantial body of evidence showing that emotional and communicative systems begin developing remarkably early.

Studies using ultrasound and MRI technology have documented facial movements in fetuses beginning in the first trimester.

Around seven to nine weeks of gestation, simple facial movements such as mouth opening and eyebrow movements begin to appear.

By eleven to fourteen weeks, researchers can observe actions such as sucking, yawning, and grimacing. As gestation progresses, these movements become increasingly coordinated and complex.

Researchers have observed:

  • Sucking and swallowing motions
  • Mouth opening and closing
  • Lip pursing
  • Eye movements
  • Grimace-like contractions
  • Yawning
  • Cry-like facial configurations
  • Cheek and tongue movements

Of course, we must be careful when interpreting these movements. Many fetal facial actions may reflect neural and motor development rather than emotional experiences as we understand them in adults. Nonetheless, the evidence suggests that the biological foundations for emotional communication are developing well before birth.

What We Know About Infants After Birth

detecting-pain-babiesResearch on infants provides additional evidence that emotional perception emerges early in life.

Numerous studies have shown that infants display increasingly differentiated emotional expressions during their first years. Other research indicates that infants as young as seven months old can distinguish between different emotional facial expressions, such as happiness and sadness.

Because infants cannot tell us what they perceive, researchers often rely on measures such as brain activity and attention patterns. These studies consistently demonstrate that infants are sensitive to emotional information long before they acquire language.

A New Study on Maternal Voice Recognition

Against this backdrop, I was particularly interested in a study published in the Journal of Neuroscience in December 2025 titled “The Neurotracking of the Maternal Voice in the Infant Brain“.

The study investigated whether infants track their mother’s voice differently from the voice of a stranger.

Twenty-five infants participated in the research. Before testing, each infant’s mother recorded herself reading a story. During the experiment, infants listened either to their own mother’s narration or to the narration of another mother while researchers recorded their brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).

The findings were striking.

The infants’ brains showed clear evidence of tracking both familiar and unfamiliar voices. However, neural tracking was consistently stronger when infants listened to their own mother’s voice.

Importantly, this effect remained even though the acoustic properties of the stories were comparable. In other words, the infants were not simply responding to differences in sound patterns; they appeared to be responding specifically to the familiarity of their mother’s voice.

Building a Mountain of Evidence

Woman in a white sun hat lifts a baby against a turquoise beach backdrop.This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that infants come into the world already attuned to their mothers and other close caregivers.

My interpretation of this research is that we are slowly building a mountain of evidence that begins before birth and continues through infancy.

From fetal facial movements to infant emotion recognition to neural responses to maternal voices, the findings increasingly point toward the same conclusion: human beings appear biologically prepared to connect with the people who care for them.

The mechanisms underlying that connection are still being explored, and many questions remain unanswered. But studies like this bring us closer to understanding how infants can recognize, respond to, and learn from their caregivers long before they understand language.

More than forty years after I first became interested in this question, it is exciting to see science continuing to provide new pieces of the puzzle.

The post How the Infant Brain Tracks Their Mother’s Voice first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

The Humintell Blog April 29, 2026

Master the Science of Nonverbal Behavior

What if everything you thought you knew about emotions was only half the story?

In this opening episode of the Nonverbal ACEs Masters Series, Dr. David Matsumoto — one of the world’s foremost authorities on emotion science, cross-cultural psychology, and the universality of facial expressions — challenges practitioners to go deeper than conventional training ever goes.

Drawing on decades of research spanning evolutionary biology, FACS methodology, and cross-cultural studies, Dr. Matsumoto unpacks:

  • Why facial expressions are biological tools, not cultural inventions — and what that means for how you read clients
  • The “open system” model of emotion: how triggers are learned, but responses are hardwired
  • Display Rules vs. Instrumental Behaviour — the two distinct layers of cultural influence that mask what clients truly feel
  • Why “Universalist” vs. “Constructivist” is a false debate — and what actually bridges them in clinical practice
  • What micro-expressions and subtle expressions reveal that macro-behaviour conceals

Whether you’re a therapist, psychologist, or coach, this episode reframes emotion not as a psychological concept — but as a biological system you can learn to read with precision.

🎯 FREE ACCESS: Watch all five episodes in the Nonverbal ACEs Masters Series: 👉 nonverbalaces.com/nvmaster-series

ABOUT DR. DAVID MATSUMOTO

Dr. David Matsumoto is a Professor of Psychology at San Francisco State University, Director of Humintell, and one of the world’s leading researchers in emotion, nonverbal behaviour, and cross-cultural psychology. His work is used by intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and clinical practitioners globally.

ABOUT THE NONVERBAL ACES MASTERS SERIES

The Masters Series brings together five world-leading experts in nonverbal behaviour, emotion science, trauma, values, and influence — giving mental health and coaching professionals the science-backed skills to read behaviour at a deeper level and transform client outcomes.

The post Master the Science of Nonverbal Behavior first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Emotion, Nonverbal Behavior, Science

The Humintell Blog March 10, 2026

[New Research] When Emotion Backfires on Social Media

In a world dominated by social media, emotional posts may feel like the most natural way to communicate. We post outrage, sadness, empathy, and passion—often believing these signals will persuade others to see what we see and feel what we feel.

But new research entitled “Emotions on our Screens” suggests something surprising: emotional expression may actually reduce persuasive impact, even when audiences agree with the message.

This insight has profound implications—not just for digital communication, but for how we understand nonverbal behavior, facial expressions of emotion, and credibility in human interaction.


Emotional Expression vs. Persuasion: A Disconnect

The study found that when people encounter emotional content online—especially expressions of sadness or distress—they often respond with skepticism rather than empathy.

Participants across multiple experiments:

  • Rated emotional posts as less authentic
  • Viewed emotional expressions as less appropriate
  • Were more likely to interpret emotional displays as manipulative

Even more striking: this reaction held regardless of political agreement. In other words, even when people agreed with the message, the emotional delivery reduced trust in the communicator.

This creates a paradox:

Emotion increases visibility and engagement—but decreases credibility and persuasion.


The Role of Nonverbal Behavior in Digital Contexts

Video Call Facetime Chatting Communication Concept

From a Humintell perspective, this research aligns closely with what we know about nonverbal communication.

In face-to-face interaction, nonverbal cues—tone, posture, gestures, and especially facial expressions of emotion—provide critical context that helps others interpret sincerity.

The shift to digital communication has undoubtedly changed the way we read people.

Dr. Matsumoto suggests that this largely stems from the fact that humans did not evolve to do 2-dimensional communication, such as through a computer screen. On the contrary, we have evolved our perceptual senses to live in a 3-dimensional world and our sense of reality is grounded in that fact.

Interactions are based on being live and in person. Being live and in person with somebody and interacting with them is what we’ve evolved to do and what we’ve learned to do all of our lives.

But online, those cues are:

  • Reduced (text-only posts)
  • Exaggerated (dramatic videos, crying selfies)
  • Or ambiguous (filtered, curated expressions)

Without full nonverbal context, audiences rely on rapid judgments:

  • “Is this genuine?”
  • “Is this performative?”
  • “Is this trying to influence me?”

When emotional signals feel misaligned or overly intense, they trigger what we might call a nonverbal credibility gap.


Facial Expressions of Emotion: When Signals Backfire

One of the most compelling findings: posts featuring a visible sad facial expression (e.g., crying) were seen as especially inappropriate and less credible.

This is fascinating from a behavioral science standpoint.

Facial expressions are typically:

  • Automatic signals of internal emotional states
  • Interpreted as honest indicators of feeling

However, in digital environments:

  • Expressions can be staged or repeated
  • Viewers assume intentional signaling rather than spontaneous emotion

This shifts perception from:

  • “They feel this” → to → “They want me to feel something”

That shift is critical. It transforms emotion from a signal of authenticity into a signal of persuasion attempt.


Why Emotion Triggers Skepticism

This phenomenon connects to a well-known concept in persuasion science: the Elaboration Likelihood Model.

When people detect persuasion attempts—especially emotional ones—they often:

  • Shift into more critical, analytical processing
  • Question the motives behind the message
  • Resist being influenced

Additionally, excessive emotional appeals can resemble what’s known as an “appeal to emotion”, where feelings are used to sway judgment rather than evidence.

In modern digital environments, audiences are highly attuned to this.

The result:

  • Emotional intensity → signals persuasion intent
  • Perceived persuasion intent → triggers skepticism
  • Skepticism → reduces influence

Emotion Still Matters—Just Not How You Think

Importantly, the research does not suggest that emotion is useless.

In fact, emotional expression:

  • Helps people build community
  • Reinforces shared identity
  • Provides psychological relief (catharsis)

So emotion is highly effective for:

  • Connection
  • Belonging
  • Engagement

But less effective for:

  • Changing minds
  • Increasing credibility
  • Persuading skeptics

Practical Implications for Communicators

If your goal is persuasion rather than expression:

  • Use emotion sparingly and strategically
  • Avoid exaggerated or performative facial expressions
  • Pair emotional content with clear, evidence-based messaging
  • Focus on credibility cues (consistency, calm delivery, clarity)

If your goal is connection:

  • Emotional expression can be powerful—but expect resonance, not persuasion

Final Thought

In a digital world saturated with emotional content, audiences are becoming more sophisticated interpreters of nonverbal behavior and emotional signaling.

The irony is clear:

The more we try to persuade through emotion, the more people question our sincerity.

Understanding how facial expressions of emotion, nonverbal cues, and perceived intent interact is no longer optional—it’s essential for anyone hoping to communicate effectively in the modern age.


Ready to Influence More Effectively?

Emotional expression alone won’t persuade—and as this research shows, it can even undermine credibility.

If you want to learn how to use emotion strategically, read nonverbal behavior, and interpret facial expressions of emotion to increase trust and influence, Humintell’s Introduction to Tactical Social Influence webinar delivers practical, science-based tools you can apply immediately.

Stop guessing. Start influencing with precision.

LEARN MORE

The post [New Research] When Emotion Backfires on Social Media first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 132
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2026 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·