William Shakespeare penned this famous line in Hamlet, “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” Two people can experience the very same thing and one person views it as good while another person sees it as bad. This happens because when we make judgments about good and bad we’re making them in relation to something else.If you’re in sales and I asked what objection do you face the most when trying to make a sale, I have no doubt the vast majority of people reading this would say, “Price!” When someone says your price is too high it’s because they’re comparing it to something else.Is $20,000 a lot to pay for a car? Some of you reading this don’t think so because you may drive a high-end car like a Mercedes or BMW, and your ride costs much more than that. Others might view $20,000 as expensive because you’re not into cars and therefore pay a good bit less than that for your vehicle of choice. In both cases, you’re comparing what you’ve paid in the past to $20,000.As a salesperson here’s what I want you to remember:“There’s nothing high or low but comparing makes it so.”The next time you face the price objection, recognize this simple fact and then look for ways to ethically change the prospective customer’s point of comparison. In the end everyone wants to feel like they got a good deal or great value. In our sales training we define value as follows:V = WIG / PValue (V) equals what I get (WIG), divided by price (P). If I can get more for the same price I feel like I got a better deal. Or, if I can get the same thing but pay less, I still believe I got a better deal.This is where you’ll see advertisers tout “25% more” or “2 for 1.” In both cases you get more (WIG) for the same price (P). On the flip side we see sales all the time. During a sale we get the same item (WIG) for less money (P). I’ve often shared the following example in training. A company in Southern California sold spas and hot tubs. Prices ranged from $6,000 on the low end to $15,000 on the upper end. As you might imagine, most salespeople started low and tried to upsell customers. The problem with that approach is once you start at $6,000 the $15,000 spa seems very, very expensive…by comparison.During a consultation with Robert Cialdini it was mentioned that people who bought the $15,000 spa used it more than some rooms in their homes. The logical question was – how much would it cost to add an additional room to a home in Southern California? Most people said anywhere from $60,000 – $80,000. Ah ha! A potential new comparison point!Dr. Cialdini advised the spa client to start the sales process with the $15,000 spa and weave the room addition question into the sales conversation. It might go something like this:Salesperson – “Customers who bought the XP5000 spa love it. In fact, many say they use it as much or more than any room in their house and quite often use it to entertain. If you were to add a room to your home how much would that cost?”Customer – “I don’t know, maybe $60,000 or $70,000.”Salesperson – “Well I have good news. You don’t need to spend $60,000 or $70,000 to get that enjoyment because the XP5000 is only $15,000.”And how well did this approach work? Sales for the high-end spa rose 520% in the three months following the change in sales approach. In the three months before the change, the company only sold five high-end spas. In the three months following the change they sold 26 spas!No new advertising, no television commercials, and no price discounts were needed. All of those approaches would cost a good bit of money. Instead they simply tweaked their sales conversation to include a legitimate new point of comparison.So for my salespeople out there, here’s your take away when dealing with the price objection – “There’s nothing high or low but comparing makes it so.” Look for legitimate comparison points then weave them into your sales conversation. If you have a good product that’s worth the asking price you should see sales take a nice jump up as you reframe how customers view your price.
Brian Ahearn, CMCT® Chief Influence Officer influencePEOPLE Helping You Learn to Hear “Yes”.
Influence is Content and Context
In an interview I recently conducted with Dr Robert B Cialdini (referred to by some as the “Godfather of Influence”) he made a simple point that due to its simplicity could be easily overlooked. He said something he found remarkable when he was conducting his systematic field based research, that ultimately led to the discovery of the six universal principles of persuasion, was “there are really two domains that are available to increase the success of an attempt to influence someone in your direction”.
1. The content of what you are offering
2. The context or the psychological frame in which the offer or request is placed
Too often we focus on the content alone. We look at the features of our product or service. We focus on what we do and create a letter, email, pitch or website based around the content. Yes the content is important but if you focus just on what you do, making it overwhelmingly detailed and polished, you can lose the target of influence long before you have the chance to get them to say “yes” to your request.
The critical aspect is the context. It is the psychological frame we have the target of influence considering the content from within. For example, if you go to see the most marvellous painting but when you arrive it is in a dark corner, housed in an old damaged frame, with larger more commanding pieces surrounding it thereby making it appear small and unimpressive. The painting will probably fail to live up to your expectations. However take the same piece of art, properly lit, framed perfectly and in a space that allows for its admiration, then the context in which the painting is viewed changes our perspective of it. The painting itself is the same; i.e. the content is the same. It is the context in which it is considered that is different.
Therefore when writing an email or preparing for a meeting, whatever, here are my tips.
Get the content down. Write it out. Purge your head of the things you need to say.
Once you have the content out then go back and look at context. Consider the framing, the phraseology and principles that best apply to presenting your case in its best possible light.
In my upcoming book Influencing Business, Dr Cialdini shares the following example:
“A number of years ago, some of my researchers and I went around to the homes in a suburb in the Phoenix, Arizona area where I’m currently living, asking people if they would be willing to donate to a good charitable cause The United Way. For half of the homes we approached we asked for a donation in the same way that the typical charity solicitor would. We described the benefits that will come from supporting the organization, the good work that we did and then asked for a contribution.
For the other half of the homes, we did exactly the same thing and then we added five words. We said “even a penny would help”.
Even a penny would help didn’t change the merits of this organization’s good works and how they went about it. None of that was changed, but we suddenly created a situation that made it difficult for them to say no. Because even a penny would help.
What happened was we increased the percentage of people who gave a contribution from 33% to 55% …by simply changing the psychological frame in which we placed that request.”
This week, consider the context in which you are presenting your requests and ask yourself, is that best possible way to get the target of influence to consider your request.
Let me know where you have seen content presented in partnership with an ill-fitting context.
The post Influence is Content and Context appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.
Persuasive Writing
Do you like receiving bills in the mail? When you see one does your heart miss a beat fearing the loss the envelope may contain? Do you enter a period of denial and leave the bills to one side and make a deal with yourself to open them later?
Do you have to send letters to others and suspect that this is their reaction to receiving the letter from you?
What is it about a bill or a formal letter that triggers this type of response? Is it the window in the envelope? Your logo? The generic typeface?
It appears that Danish mortgage bank BRF Kredit were sending letters to cash strapped home-owners to help them out of their situation but most were failing to respond. BRF believed the fear the recipient had of the envelope was contributing to the non-response.
So what did they do?
BRF replaced the standard fear inducing envelope complete with logo and replaced it with a normal plain envelope; one where the recipient’s name and address was handwritten onto it.
By using this approach across 1300 cases BRF state that it has been able to get 9 out of 10 home-owners back on their feet because they are engaging with the bank saving them and the bank between 100 and 150 million Danish kroner (18-27 million USD).
As the article doesn’t articulate whether any split testing was done (i.e. some envelopes sent with handwriting and the logo; handwritten with no logo; typed with no logo; and we know typed with logo resulted with no-response) we don’t know which attribute was more persuasive in having home-owners open the letter and subsequently read the offer of assistance provided by the bank.
While in the case of BRF we don’t know if it was the personalised address we do know that research conducted by Randy Garner in 2005 found that when a post-it note with a hand written request for the recipient to complete a survey was used, the response rate was significantly higher when the post-it note was attached and personalised.
The post-it note draws attention to the request and the personalisation triggers Reciprocity.
Fellow CMCT Brian Ahearn used this tactic to get $700,000 repaid after an accounting error and the UK Government used handwritten notes stating “This message is important” to boost tax compliance that they estimated for every dollar spent on handwriting returned $2000.
Don’t you think it worth a try!
So this week what will you handwrite? Write the card, the envelope, the post-it note. Show the effort and reap the rewards.
Sources:
http://politiken.dk/oekonomi/privatoekonomi/ECE1509255/haandskrevne-kuverter-faar-skyldnere-til-at-aabne-brevet/
Garner, R (2005) Post-It® Note Persuasion: A Sticky Influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 230-237.
Ahearn, B (2012) http://influence-people-brian.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/700000-great-reasons-to-use-yellow.html
Freakonomics: http://freakonomics.com/2013/04/03/the-tax-man-nudgeth-full-transcript/
The post Persuasive Writing appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- …
- 64
- Next Page »