This month we have another new guest writer. Like myself and several other guest bloggers for Influence PEOPLE, Debbie Hixson is a Cialdini Method Certified Trainer®. Debbie is a manager in the Leader Strategy and Programs division at Kaiser Permanente where she’s been for nearly 20 years. She earned her B.A., Psychology, has an M.Ed. in Counseling and Educational Psychology, a Masters of Arts in Human Resources Development and is currently working on her Ph.D. in Organizational Leadership! I know you’ll enjoy Debbie’s insightful perspective on influence and persuasion.Brian Ahearn, CMCT® Chief Influence Officer influencePEOPLE Helping You Learn to Hear “Yes”.Some Acts of Giving Can Span Decades and LifetimesI read in my Sunday paper about a cemetery in Holland where American soldiers who fought the Nazis in World War II are buried. It seems that each of the 8,300 graves in Margraten, a small village in the Netherlands, are tended by Dutch, Belgian or German families, along with schools, companies, and military organizations. On Memorial Day this year they came as they do several times a year to place flowers in front of headstones of people they didn’t know and to honor their service. At the cemetery’s annual commemoration 6,000 people flooded the 65-acre burial grounds including many descendants of the American soldiers who traveled from all over the U.S. They came to pay tribute to their parents and grandparents who fought to defeat the Nazis. And they came to thank the people who had been tending the graves of their loved ones for over 70 years. Some of the caretakers have passed the responsibility on from generation to generation. The responsibility is felt so deeply that there is a list of over 100 people waiting to become caretakers of the graves.What would cause a nation recovering from the trauma of being invaded during World War II and their own personal losses to adopt the fallen of another nation? And what would keep this commitment alive all these years later, when the pain and significance of the war had faded. It is unique in this world, wouldn’t you say?In September 1944, the village of Margraten and its 1,500 inhabitants had been freed from Nazi occupation. The war was not over and many American soldiers died in nearby battles with the goal of breaking through the German lines and trying to capture bridges that connected the Netherlands to Germany. The losses sustained were heavy and the American nation needed a place to bury its dead. They choose a fruit orchard just outside Margraten. The villagers of Margraten embraced the Americans and grieved for their fallen. They provided food and shelter for the U.S. commanders and their troops. After four years of being occupied by the Nazis, they were free. Life could return to normal and once again they could enjoy the freedoms they had before the invasion. They realized that they had the Americans to thank for that freedom. For the gift of their freedom, the people of Margraten reciprocated by tending year after year to the graves of the solders who gave their lives to restore it. The rule of reciprocity, according to Dr. Robert Cialdini, says that when we receive something, a favor, a kindness, etc., we feel obligated to repay it. He says that “so typical is it for indebtedness to accompany the receipt of such things that a phrase like ‘much obliged’ has become a synonym for ‘thank you,” not only in the English language but in others as well.” Although obligations extend into the future they can be short lived unless they are notable and memorable such as the American sacrifice to free the people of Margraten. In some cases such as this, the obligation is felt so keenly that the thank you never ends. We can see this illustrated in a recent ceremony in Margraten to honor the fallen Americans. One American conveyed the essence of the bond between the Dutch and the U.S. His name is Arthur Chotin and the Naaijken family tends his father’s grave. He said to the audience of Americans and current caretakers, “By making these dead part of your family, you have become part of our family. You have created a bond between us that will never be broken. So, from this day forward, from now until the end of time, a heartfelt thank you.”In our own lives we have experienced reciprocity. We all learned as children that when someone does something nice for us, we do something nice for that someone in return. It works well for us and in our society to reciprocate. We have not-so-nice words for people who do not reciprocate. Reciprocating with others establishes relationships whether they are professional or personal in nature. In my work, I use reciprocity to develop long-lasting relationships with my clients that are mutually beneficial. Before I make a request of them, I consider giving them something first. It might be giving time to listen to their concerns, or sharing ideas to address their problems. In return I ask for their trust to be completely honest in our coaching relationship. Then I ask them to listen to my feedback as well as try out my suggestions for addressing their leadership challenges. Because we keep reciprocating the relationship continues indefinitely for as long as we work together. Reciprocity is a powerful tool to influence others. It is based on the idea that we help those who help us. It begins by giving someone a gift – your time, your advice, etc. In turn they will usually support your request because the rule says we’re to give back to those who first give to us. It is a powerful motivator for us to comply with other’s requests when they have given to us and it’s powerful because others will do what you ask when you give to them first. So start with this thought, “Whom can I help?” rather than, “Who can help me?” Do so and you will initiate and develop long-lasting, mutually beneficial relationships. Try it. Debbie Hixson, CMCT®
What’s in a Name?
“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” That famous quote comes from William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet. Juliet utters that line to Romeo as she makes the point that no matter his name (he was a Montague and his family was at odds with Juliet’s family, the Capulets) he is still the man she loves.It’s a well-known line that does contain an element of truth because the rose would smell every bit as sweet no matter what we called it. However, if we renamed the rose something like “The Dogcrap Flower,” very few people would be willing to even sniff it.This understanding came to light recently when I approached an individual about an idea I had. I wanted to rename something but I knew this person was heavily invested in the current name. Here’s how I approached the conversation:Me – Have you ever had Patagonian Toothfish? Other – (making an “ewe gross” sound) No, I don’t think I have. Sounds kind of gross.Me – Have you tried Chilean Seabass?Other – Yes, I love it.Me – Did you know they’re the same thing? (I hear a chuckle). Nobody was buying Patagonian Toothfish because it sounds bad so they renamed it Chilean Seabass in the 1970s. I bring this up because I think we have a naming problem.From there I described the problem and the other person agreed rather quickly to explore the name change.Aside from an example like that, names, words and labels matter a lot! And it doesn’t always matter what the dictionary has to say about what a word means because ultimately we give meaning to words. Understanding your audience and their interpretation of words is what matters most. Here are a few examples.Thug – a violent criminal (Merriam-Webster)We heard this word used repeatedly in connection with the recent Baltimore riots. It’s true that those who looted and destroyed were violent criminals. However, many people came down hard on those who used the word – including Baltimore’s mayor and President Obama (both African-American) – because in society the word has become more closely associated with African-Americans. There was a time when the word was used to describe Irish immigrant criminals, gangsters in the 1920s and 1930s, and even former Detroit Piston center Bill Lambier. But the connotation in today’s media is so heavily skewed towards African-Americans that it’s becoming a race-related word. Niggardly – hating to spend money, very small amount (Merriam-Webster)In 1999 David Howard used this word when referring to the budget for Washington D.C. and was relieved of his position after a race-related complaint. Eventually he took a different position working for the city and said he learned from the incident. Bastard – a person born to parents not married to each other (TheFreeDictionary.com)We can probably all think of someone we know who was born to parents who never married. If you used this word to describe that someone you’d probably get popped in the mouth or get an earful of condemnation for being insensitive. Most people in that situation would have no problem talking about their parents never marrying but would not take kindly to the label.There was an urban legend about the Chevy Nova not selling in Spanish speaking countries because in Spanish Nova means “no go.” There was no truth to the story but it too belies the point that a name can have a profound impact on the listener.What does this have to do with persuasion? A lot! Understanding your audience – what words will help and what words will offend – and keeping in mind your ultimate goal will help you craft your persuasive message.Do we want to see race relations improve in this country? I believe the vast majority of people would say yes. Tossing around the word thug, when you know how it will be perceived, is not something a smart persuader would do. If an African-American mayor and president can’t avoid controversy then neither will you.Budgets may be tight but the wise persuader would not use the word niggardly – no matter how the dictionary defines it – because they realize someone will be offended and their message will be lost.If you want to help tackle the issue of children being born out of wedlock you best not refer to those children as bastards because you’ll offend so many people that your desire to help and good ideas will never be heard. Yes, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet but rename it incorrectly and almost nobody will take a sniff. The words we use can make all the difference so make sure your words work for you, not against you.Brian Ahearn, CMCT® Chief Influence Officer influencePEOPLE Helping You Learn to Hear “Yes”.
If You are Wrong – Tom Brady – Admit it Quickly and Emphatically
I don’t know about you but I’m sick and tired of athletes getting caught red-handed cheating or involved in some scandal only to defiantly maintain their innocence. Pete Rose, Lance Armstrong, A-Rod come to mind and now Tom Brady has joined the list. Eventually the truth comes out and each person only compounded his problems with the lies that ensued. Of course, this issue isn’t limited to just athletes. We’ve all seen our fair share of politicians, religious leaders, businesspeople and many others go through the same thing.Just once I’d like to hear someone say, “I did it. It was wrong. No excuses and now I’m willing to bear whatever punishment comes my way.” The public doesn’t care why they did what they did because it’s all excuses. My old high school football coach said it best, “Excuses are like a—holes. Everybody has one and they all stink!” The only thing people care about is what they did. Lying after getting caught only compounds cheating. Thus the well-known saying, “The cover up is worse than the crime.” When will they learn? I realize a lot is at stake, but had each of the aforementioned people taken their medicine when they were caught, odds are they’d be back in the good graces of the public by now. Tiger Woods, as horrible as his behavior was, fessed up, sought help, and is in a much better place than Pete, Lance, A-Rod or Tom.Football is a game of inches. Sometimes the slightest advantage makes all the difference between winning and losing. But the point is not whether or not deflating a football a little bit makes a difference or not, or whether fans and players think the rule is silly, IT’S THE RULE. The issue with Tom Brady is twofold. First, he chose to break the rule and only did so because he felt it would be an advantage for him. If he didn’t think balls with slightly less pressure would help he wouldn’t have instructed others to let a little air out. Like the rule or not, he knowingly broke it.Second, and more important now, he lied about it. For most people when everything is on the line we see their true character. Sometimes people choose to risk life and limb for others but most people focus just on themselves. That’s the choice Tom Brady made.In Dale Carnegie’s classic How to Win Friends and Influence People,he has some great advice under the section Be a Leader (something Tom Brady is supposed to be):”When you’re wrong, admit it quickly and emphatically.”Carnegie’s advice taps into Robert Cialdini’s principle of authority. One shortcut to gain credibility with others is to admit weakness or mistakes before the other person brings them. In doing so you’ve viewed as more truthful.If I were in the NFL, I might get flagged for a 15-yard penalty for “piling on” with this blog post. I don’t dislike Tom Brady or the New England Patriots. In fact, I was pulling for them to win the Super Bowl years ago when they had a chance to go undefeated because it would have been a historic event. But no longer can I root for them at all because it seems at every turn Tom Brady, Bill Belichick and the organization are embroiled in controversy over the rules. When there’s smoke there’s usually fire. Admit you started the fire and do all you can to prevent any more from starting!Here’s my final thought: Tom Brady needs to grow a pair and take his punishment like a man. Of course, maybe he already has a pair but if so, then they’re obviously a bit deflated too. Brian Ahearn, CMCT® Chief Influence Officer influencePEOPLE Helping You Learn to Hear “Yes”.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- …
- 64
- Next Page »